On Qualitatively New Productive Forces and Their Advantages for China
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Qualitatively new productive forces refer to material, technological and intellectual capabilities associated with a fourth industrial revolution and their potential to drive productivity growth and improvements in the satisfaction of human needs. In capitalist societies these transformations are associated with crises and waves of creative destruction raising the question as to whether a socialist polity can manage them in less destructive ways. In Capital Marx provided tools to analyse the turbulent implications of radical increases in productivity. At present Chinese public and private capital is playing a leading role in radical productivity growth and the development of new products (as part of a structural transformation designed to create new drivers of growth to replace older ones that have lost momentum). China’s progress poses a major competitive challenge for incumbents who are unable to match the price and quality of Chinese made goods. In the Collective West the fundamental problems derive from a secular decline in productivity growth since the 1970s itself due to a decline in the rate of profit, and financialisation. A response of the Collective West is to intensify its attempts to suppress China’s development. Their ultimate effectiveness is questioned.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Fourth Industrial Revolution, productivity and investment, competition and the law of value, trade and technology war, supply-side structural transformation, Chinese modernization
Dunford, M. 2022. The Chinese Path to Common Prosperity. International Critical Thought 12(1), 35-54. doi:10.1080/21598282.2022.2025561.
Freeman, C., & Perez, C. 1988. Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, & G. S. Silverberg, Luc (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Frances Pinter.
Goldman, D. P. 2024. America has no Ukraine Plan B except more war. Asia Times. Retrieved from https://asiatimes.com/author/david-p-goldman-2/.
Jorgenson, D. W., Ho, M. S., & Samuels, J. D. 2015. US economic growth–Retropect and prospect. Lessons from a prototype industry-level production account for the United States, 1947-2012. Paper presented at the Th ird World KLEMS Conference. Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy, Tokyo. https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/munho/files/usecongrowth1947-2012.pdf.
Marx, K. 1976 [1867]. Capital. A critique of political economy (B. Fowkes, Trans. Vol. 1). Harmondsworth: Penguin Books in association with New Left Review.
Schumpeter, J. A. 1983 [1934]. The theory of economic development. An inquiry into proits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers.
Schumpeter, J. A. 2003 [1943]. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London and New York: Routledge.
The World Bank. 2023. World development indicators. Washington D.C.: The World Bank Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org
Trotsky, L. 1957 [1928]. The Third International after Lenin (Second ed.). New York: Pioneer Publishers.
Van der Linden, M. 2007. The ‘law’ of uneven and combined development: Some underdeveloped thoughts. Historical Materialism-Research in Critical Marxist Theory 15(1), 145-165. doi:10.1163/156920607x171627.
Varoufakis, Y. 2023. Technofeudalism. What killed capitalism. London: The Bodley Head.
Han Wenxiu, 2024 Promote high-quality development by deepening reform — In depth study and implementation of General Secretary Xi Jinping’s important expositions on high-quality development, Qiushi, 12, 2024.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.